And my two points remain: that there is nothing in these two substandard efforts to suggest the glories of CR.and that we can't know how much P&W brought to the table without having seen both the scripts, before and after Haggis. If P&W had nothing to do with it, that leaves them with two of the worst Bonds, imo. In fact, you've strengthened my argument for me. And that wasn't the line I was taking, as you'll see if you reread my post. I did not suggest,imply or hint that Fleming had no involvement. Well, scrape me off your shoes and call me sticky.Īs for the line above that, you'll do no such thing.

And I only count two 'previous scripts' as TND had nothing to do with P&W. So, according to you CR is only about P&W and Haggis, then? Fleming had no involvement?